Research Article
Formal research with appropriate methods, evidence, citations, ethics disclosures, and scholarly structure.
Contribute to WBR
Wolf Business Review welcomes thoughtful work from researchers, practitioners, educators, leaders, technologists, business professionals, students, and interdisciplinary contributors.
Formal research with appropriate methods, evidence, citations, ethics disclosures, and scholarly structure.
Evidence-informed analysis designed to help professionals understand and act on real problems.
Focused analysis or synthesis of a timely idea, problem, trend, or professional question.
Concise explanation of a technology, technical issue, implementation question, or emerging development.
Evidence-aware argument, interpretation, or informed professional perspective.
Strong research or evidence-informed scholarship from student contributors, evaluated on quality rather than status.
Your manuscript should fit WBR’s Business, Education, Technology, or Interdisciplinary scope and make a clear contribution for the intended audience. WBR evaluates quality and contribution rather than academic rank, employer prestige, institutional affiliation, professional title, or career stage.
Microsoft Word (.docx) is preferred for initial submissions; PDF is accepted for initial review. APA 7th edition is WBR’s default citation style. Research and Student Research submissions normally include a 150–250 word abstract and approximately 3–6 keywords.
AI may not be listed as an author. Substantive generative-AI assistance must be disclosed. Human authors remain responsible for accuracy, originality, citations, integrity, interpretation, and the final manuscript.
Authors must disclose relevant conflicts of interest, prior or simultaneous submission concerns, and required research-ethics information. Human-participant research should include appropriate ethics or institutional review information when applicable. All authors must approve the submitted work.
Submissions receive administrative screening and preliminary editorial review. The Editor-in-Chief makes the human editorial decision. WBR may request revisions, decline a manuscript, accept it for publication, or seek qualified outside human review when subject-matter or methodological evaluation is needed.
AI-assisted editorial evaluation is advisory and is not peer review. WBR uses the term “peer reviewed” only after documented substantive review by qualified human reviewers.